• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
    • Editorial Staff
      • Bryan Strawser, Editor in Chief, Strife
      • Dr Anna B. Plunkett, Founder, Women in Writing
      • Strife Journal Editors
      • Strife Blog Editors
      • Strife Communications Team
      • Senior Editors
      • Series Editors
      • Copy Editors
      • Strife Writing Fellows
      • Commissioning Editors
      • War Studies @ 60 Project Team
      • Web Team
    • Publication Ethics
    • Open Access Statement
  • Archive
  • Series
  • Strife Journal
  • Strife Policy Papers
    • Strife Policy Papers: Submission Guidelines
    • Vol 1, Issue 1 (June 2022): Perils in Plain Sight
  • Contact us
  • Submit to Strife!

Strife

The Academic Blog of the Department of War Studies, King's College London

  • Announcements
  • Articles
  • Book Reviews
  • Call for Papers
  • Features
  • Interviews
  • Strife Policy Papers
    • Strife Policy Papers: Submission Guidelines
    • Vol 1, Issue 1 (June 2022): Perils in Plain Sight
You are here: Home / Archives for trauma

trauma

Series on Women and Children’s Health in Conflict – The hidden face of the blockade and wars: Palestinian children with psychological wounds

August 13, 2021 by Dr Bahzad Z F Alakhras

Two children playing in the Gaza Strip. Photo licensed under Creative Commons.

This article is part of the Strife Series on Women and Children’s Health in Conflict. Read the Series Introduction at this link.


In recent years, the urgent need to address the global burden of mental health disorders has grown exponentially. Huge efforts have been undertaken to investigate this in low and middle-income countries (LMIC), where many factors exist that are detrimental to mental health. These include political, economic, social and individual factors1,2. Moreover, the demographic distribution of LMICs, where on average 50% of population is under the age of 18, makes intervention all the more pressing3,4. This is supported by evidence that most mental health disorders emerge at younger ages, making it a global responsibility to cooperate and establish evidence-based strategies for Child and Adolescents Menta Health (CAMH) services in these countries5.

In this context, conflict zones have been of special interest, as it is evident that the burden of mental health in such settings is higher than in areas without conflict2,5. A well-established example is the devastating effects of the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict on the Palestinian CAMH. Among Palestinian adolescents in Gaza Strip, 94.9% reported severe anxiety, 68.9% had post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and 40% reported experiencing severe depression6.

Since the beginning of the second intifada, uprising, in 2000, there has been a constant increase in reported psychological and emotional symptoms among Palestinian children7. This is unsurprising as the occupied Palestinian territories (oPt), especially Gaza, have been through multiple military assaults and violent events. This has led some national and international organizations to argue that an epidemic of mental illness exists amongst Palestinians in the oPt, and that it is particularly harmful for children and young women.

Different factors need to be considered when speaking about Palestinian children’s mental health issues, which broadly fall into direct or indirect causes. Direct factors involve witnessing traumatic events experienced by people around them, such as a relative or a friend being killed, injured, targeted, or imprisoned. The effect of these factors is evident in the countless children who are lie awake at night, tormented by resistive nightmares, and mental images of mutilated bodies and buildings or houses being bombed7.

Indirect factors can be seen in the negative knock-on effects of the blockade and the subsequent lack of resources and opportunities for Palestinians. Unemployment, poverty, loss of hope and learned helplessness are major detrimental social factors that affect Palestinian families. Parents, especially fathers, experience high levels of anxiety, says Dr. Sami Oweida, a psychiatrist at Gaza Community Mental Health Program (GCMHP). Fathers in the Palestinian culture are the family leaders; therefore, they are expected to be the most resilient, and they have to complain less and show strength almost all of the time. He adds that parents take out this anxiety unwillingly on other family members, often including children. This situation aggravates the children’s already existing psychological difficulties because of the aforementioned conflict-related factors. Dr Oweida pointed to an example of one of his clients, who was already receiving treatment for PTSD related to the 2014 attacks on Gaza and was injured during the Great March of Return in 2018. ‘[H]e had not been fully treated, but he went to the border again, one of the explanations could be the release of anger in a socially proper way’.

More than 70% of Palestinian children show symptoms that qualify for the diagnosis of PTSD. These include reexperiencing traumatic events through flashbacks, nightmares, and compulsively recalling distressing images. Children also show symptoms of avoidance and withdrawal from their environment as well as hyperarousal and hyperactivity. Another endemic disorder is Separation Anxiety6. Children feel distressed, anxious and afraid when they separate from their families or parents. This has affected their academic performance, their social activities, and their self-confidence.

In the Gaza Strip, and after fourteen years of continuous blockade, it was unsurprising to hear the senior health advisor of Save the Children say, ‘A whole generation of children in Gaza is balancing on a knife edge where one more shock could have devastating life-long consequences’. But what can be done? Three major problems stand in the way of the delivery of therapy to affected children.

First, mental health professionals in Gaza agree that children do not suffer from just PTSD, where a single traumatic event results in the symptoms of PTSD. Instead, they are afflicted by ongoing traumatic stress syndrome, that it is, the continuous and multi-origin experience of trauma among Palestinians, especially the children. A leading clinical Psychologist at GCMHP said that the children do not have sufficient time to recover from previous traumatic experiences before they encounter a new one. In Gaza there were four major violent escalations between Palestinians and Israelis in less than eight years from 2006 to 2014. This has led to a near constant experience of trauma, which results in an aggravated and a cumulative effect on Palestinian children.

The second problem exacerbating the situation is that those helping are themselves not protected from the effects of traumatic life events in Gaza. Professionals who work with children are also suffering and trying to cope with their traumatic experiences. Once clinical psychologist, who is a leading professional at GCMHP and focuses on PTSD patients, lost six immediate members of his family in 2014. Mohammed Mansour, a trauma specialist at Physicians for Human Rights has said ‘mental health specialists in Gaza have no other option than to digest their emotional and traumatic difficulties before they go to treat their clients’.

Finally, mental health infrastructure, resources, and staff are extremely limited in Gaza. For the two million residents of the strip, there is only one certified child psychiatrist, despite the fact that half of the population is below the age of 18. Additionally, less than 2% of the Ministry of Health’s budget goes towards mental health services6.

In the oPt, whole generations of children have known nothing but war, blockade, poverty, and unemployment. This has resulted in unprecedentedly high levels of mental health illness and psychological afflictions for this population. A lack of resources, continuity of trauma and the helpers themselves being exposed to the situation have exacerbated the situation. However, people and children have never lost hope, and they continue to dream of a better, more peaceful, future.

References

  1. Chisholm, D., A. J. Flisher, C. Lund, V. Patel, S. Saxena, G. Thornicroft, and M. Tomlinson. 2007. “Scale up services for mental disorders: a call for action.” Lancet 370 (9594): 1241-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61242-2.
  2. Eaton, J., L. McCay, M. Semrau, S. Chatterjee, F. Baingana, R. Araya, C. Ntulo, G. Thornicroft, and S. Saxena. “Scale up of services for mental health in low-income and middle-income countries.” Lancet 378 (9802): 1592-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60891-x.
  3. de Jong, J. T., I. H. Komproe, and M. Van Ommeren. “Common mental disorders in postconflict settings.” Lancet 361 (9375): 2128-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13692-6.
  4. Steel, Z., T. Chey, D. Silove, C. Marnane, R. A. Bryant, and M. van Ommeren. 2009. “Association of torture and other potentially traumatic events with mental health outcomes among populations exposed to mass conflict and displacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Jama 302 (5): 537-49. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1132.
  5. World Health, Organization. 2009. Mental health systems in selected low- and middle-income countries: a WHO-AIMS cross-national analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  6. Elbedour, S., A. J. Onwuegbuzie, J. Ghannam, J. A. Whitcome, and F. Abu Hein. 2007. “Post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety among Gaza Strip adolescents in the wake of the second Uprising (Intifada).” Child Abuse Negl 31 (7): 719-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.09.006.
  7. Vostanis, Panos. 2003. “Impact of trauma on Palestinian children’s mental health: lessons from the Gaza studies.” International Psychiatry 1: 5-6. https://doi.org/10.1192/S174936760000641X.

 

 

Filed Under: Blog Article, Feature, Series Tagged With: children, PTSD, trauma, women and children in conflict series

The face of ‘the Other’: A visual reflection on moral obligation in the 21st century

January 28, 2014 by Strife Staff

Photography by Tom Bradley [*]
Introduction by Alister Wedderburn

* * *

For Emmanuel Levinas, the foundation of the ethical relation is what he calls ‘the face of the Other’. The face presumes a moral obligation to others, because it establishes a recognisable and mutual humanity that makes concrete one’s ethical obligations and responsibilities: ‘…the face of the Other is destitute; it is the poor for whom I can do all and to whom I owe all’.[1]

The photography of Tom Bradley visualises Levinas’ theory. Bradley has travelled to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Togo, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Nigeria, India, Nepal, Myanmar, Bangladesh and the United States of America in order to photograph sufferers of leprosy. The subjects of these photographs have faces that to us are doubly ‘Other’: firstly, because they are mostly from countries that we consider distant or alien, but also because of the social difficulties that their disease creates: these people are often outcasts, an ‘Other’ within an ‘Other’.

Bradley says his project ‘is a record for the future of the varied lives of people affected by leprosy now’ – but he also makes clear that this is not just a documentary project: ‘It is also a call for attention, perhaps even for change, to a disease that can be so destructive and damaging – mentally and socially as well as physically. Leprosy is a disease that has been curable for almost three decades, yet is still alive in the world today.’ The disease is considered officially ‘eliminated’ if fewer than 1 in 10,000 people have it, but in a country the size of India – which declared leprosy ‘eliminated’ in 2005 – this still means up to 120,000 cases.

Bradley’s photography is a powerful record of this often-hidden, often-forgotten, often-stigmatised disease and the people who suffer from it. But it is worth looking at his photographs with Levinas’ ethical vision in mind. The fact that we are looking upon an image of a face rather than a face in the flesh is irrelevant – for Levinas, while responsibility is reciprocal between the connected or facing parties, this reciprocity is not interdependent. One’s own commitment towards the ‘Other’ is not contractual, is not contingent upon this ‘Other’ fulfilling his or her commitment towards oneself: ‘Reciprocity is his affair’.[2] This obligation must therefore be enacted unilaterally: ‘Responsibility is what is incumbent on me exclusively, and what, humanly, I cannot refuse’.[3] Looking at Bradley’s work will raise personal questions about the extent to which such responsibility is incumbent upon us, in the cosseted comfort of our internet connections – and how, by extension, we are to acknowledge it.

Tom Bradley will be travelling to Amman in the coming weeks to document Syrian-Jordanian relations. A selection of the resulting photographs will be published in Strife in February.

Picture1

This member of the Association has damaged fingers and toes. He’s also a very hard-working carpenter. Here he has just finished sawing wood to make a wardrobe that will be sold in town. Adzope, Ivory Coast, 2012

Picture2

John Annan (background) sits with another patient in the male ward. Some of the patients, like John, have had leprosy for many years, while others have been diagnosed recently. All are apprehensive about the future. Ankaful hospital, Ghana, 2012

Picture3

Konan Josephine receives some care from Ouattara, one of Manikro’s voluntary health agents. Manikro, Ivory Coast, 2012

Picture4

Mr Hope, the town chief, wheels himself in to get his dressings changed. Ganta, Liberia, 2012

Picture5

John Enu used to be a shoemaker at the hospital. He got paid very little and retired with no pension. He relies heavily on help from the sisters at Ahotokurom. He makes some money by brewing herbal concoctions. Enyindakurom, Ghana, 2012

Picture6

Pierre, one of the voluntary ‘health agents’ looks at Kouakou Hare crawling into the clinic. Kouakou was begging in Bouake during the war and returned to find the hospital gutted. Manikro, Ivory Coast, 2012

Picture7

Konah, a former leprosy patient, is an expert craftsman despite having no fingers left. Ganta, Liberia, 2012

Picture8

Patient during morning dressing changes. Karigiri, India, 2012

Picture9

The same patient’s foot. Doctors later decided that the infection had spread too far and gone too and amputated the following week. Karigiri, India, 2012

Picture10

Til Kumari, a resident of Khokana. He is blind, with no fingers or toes. He gets a stipend of around $5 worth a month to live off, his only income. Khokana, Nepal, 2009

Picture11

A patient at the National Hansen’s Disease Centre in Louisiana. He is originally from the San Francisco Bay Area. He didn’t want to be identified. Baton Rouge, United States, 2012
_______________________
NOTES
[*] http://www.isleprosyeliminated.com.
[1] Levinas, E. (1985): Ethics And Infinity (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press), pp. 87-9.
[2] Levinas (1985), p. 98.
[3] Levinas (1985), p. 101.

Filed Under: Blog Article Tagged With: Alister Wedderburn, images of conflict, photography, Tom Bradley, trauma, victims

Footer

Contact

The Strife Blog & Journal

King’s College London
Department of War Studies
Strand Campus
London
WC2R 2LS
United Kingdom

blog@strifeblog.org

 

Recent Posts

  • Climate-Change and Conflict Prevention: Integrating Climate and Conflict Early Warning Systems
  • Preventing Coup d’Étas: Lessons on Coup-Proofing from Gabon
  • The Struggle for National Memory in Contemporary Nigeria
  • How UN Support for Insider Mediation Could Be a Breakthrough in the Kivu Conflict
  • Strife Series: Modern Conflict & Atrocity Prevention in Africa – Introduction

Tags

Afghanistan Africa Brexit China Climate Change conflict counterterrorism COVID-19 Cybersecurity Cyber Security Diplomacy Donald Trump drones Elections EU feature France India intelligence Iran Iraq ISIL ISIS Israel ma Myanmar NATO North Korea nuclear Pakistan Politics Russia security strategy Strife series Syria terrorism Turkey UK Ukraine United States us USA women Yemen

Licensed under Creative Commons (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivatives) | Proudly powered by Wordpress & the Genesis Framework